Legal Opinion

Looney v. Bingham Dairy

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1929No. 4795PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

This case was here on a former appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The judgment was reversed and a new trial granted, 70 U. 398; 260 P. 855. A retrial before a jury again resulted in a judgment in favor of the plain tiff against the firm or copartnership and against James Makrakis and Chris Furgis individually, the members of the firm, from which all of the defendants again appeal.

On the first trial it was alleged in the complaint that the defendants Chris Furgis and James Makrakis were partners in business at Bingham Canyon carrying on a dairy business ; that in connection with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Keating v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Dover v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Zampella v. FitzhenrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  5. Dover v. Mayes Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Benke v. SteppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Russell Ex Rel. Russell v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Pullan Ex Rel. Pullan v. SteinmetzUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Looney v. FurgisUtah Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API