Legal Opinion

Looney v. Furgis

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1931No. 5157PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtElias Hansen, J.

On two prior occasions this cause has been before us on appeal by the defendants. Looney v. Bingham Dairy et al., 70 Utah 398, 260 P. 855; Id. 75 Utah 53, 282 P. 1030. The plaintiff has again secured a judgment and the defendants have appealed. On this appeal the defendants claim the judgment should be reversed; because the evidence does not justify the verdict, because the court erred in its instructions to the jury, and because the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence over the objection of the defendants. In the main the evidence brought here for review on this appeal is the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Looney v. Bingham DairyUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Looney v. Bingham DairyUtah Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pullan Ex Rel. Pullan v. SteinmetzUtah Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API