Legal Opinion

Keating v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1893PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Ingliam. (Person, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings-error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action for personal injuries,, by which the plaintiff lost one foot and received serious injuries to the other. At the time of the alleged injury plaintiff was about seven years of age. The injury consisted in being run over by a car of the.defendant company, the-crushing of an ankle, requiring amputation of that leg,, and an injury to the heel of the other foot.

The injury occurred in the city of Lansing, near the-passenger depot of defendant at that place. !die defendant’s main track runs north and south past the station. To the west of the main line was a side track in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Kefee v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  4. Birge v. GardinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
  5. City of Chillicothe ex rel. Matson v. RaynardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Iamurri v. Saginaw City Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Jacobson v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Schulwitz v. Delta Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Dougherty ex rel. Dougherty v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. CoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API