Dodge Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Noland Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN Associate Judge.
Appellee, plaintiff in the trial court, sued appellant for the balance due of $635.79 on the purchase price for certain boiler burner units. The defense was that the specifications of the original order were not met, and that therefore the sum sued for was being withheld by way of recoupment for breach of' warranty. The evidence developed that one Burke, a representative for the Kewanee-Ross Corporation, a manufacturer of boilers (hereinafter ref érréd tó as K-R), procured orders from defendant which were transmitted to plaintiff, exclusive distributor for K-R in this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nolan v. WerthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Hubshman v. Louis Keer Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Slater v. BerlinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. SabelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- United Clay Products Co. v. LinderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lewis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Smith v. Lo CastroDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Stone Heating & Ventilating Co. v. Anacostia Leasing Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969