Legal Opinion

Smith v. Lo Castro

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1957No. 2034PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Acting Judge.

Smith, a seafood broker, brought this suit against Lo Castro for a balance due for shipments of fish sold and delivered to Charles H. Javins & Sons, Inc., a corporation. The theory of plaintiff’s claim as developed at trial was that defendant had bound himself by oral promises to personally pay the debt. There was a general finding for defendant, and this appeal followed.

The Javins corporation had been carried as a charge customer on Smith’s books for some twenty years before Lo Castro bought all the stock in the company and took over its operation. At that time there was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strohecker v. Schumacher & Seiler, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Thomas v. EhrmantrautDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Mid-Atlantic Appliances, Inc. v. MorganSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  4. United Clay Products Co. v. LinderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. Dodge Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Noland Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alvin Epstein Advertising v. HelferDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Com. v. Witucki, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API