Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lang v. Civil Court of Milwaukee County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The purpose of the writ sought herein is to enjoin the civil court from proceeding further in the bastardy action mentioned above, pursuant to an order made by Judge Runge on December 23, 1936, by which a judgment entered October 10, 1934, was declared void and vacated, and a new hearing granted. Inasmuch as the respondents’ motion to quash is equivalent to a general demurrer (State ex rel. Allis v. Wiesner, 187 Wis. 384, 204 N. W. 589), the following facts alleged in the petition, or in effect incorporated therein by statements in exhibits made a part thereof, must be deemed admitted. Prior…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Foltz v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Bigelow v. ForrestSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Maslen v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Day v. MicouSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sowle v. BrittichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Lyons v. De ValkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Ryan v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. J. M. S. Ex Rel. Webb v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Heffernan v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API