Kam v. Noh
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, CJ.
The question presented in this appeal is whether a restrictive covenant in a deed imposing building height limitations expired by operation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 171 — 63(b). The statute, relating to the sale of public lands by the State, provides that “all restrictions relating to the use” of residential lots sold in fee simple shall expire within ten years after issuance of the deed. The court below dismissed Appellants’ complaint seeking enforcement of the restrictive covenant, finding that the covenant expired by operation of law. Because we…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- Albemarle County v. Marshall, ClerkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. TaylorHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- Puchert v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Shimabuku v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Dines v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Heilker v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.