Legal Opinion
Luiken v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 14, 2011No. Civil No. 09-516 (DWF/TNL)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Doc. No. 442). For the reasons set forth below, the court grants Plaintiffs’ motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Matt Luiken and John Sandquist are both residents of Minnesota. According to the Complaint, Luiken is currently employed as a Domino’s Pizza, LLC (“Domino’s”) delivery driver and has been since August 2006. (Doc. No. 85, Am. Compl. ¶ 9.) Sandquist was employed as a Domino’s delivery driver from approximately September 2006 to March 2008.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In Re: St. Jude Medical, Inc., Silzone Heart Valve Products Liability Litigation. Lester Grovatt Beatrice Bailey Levy D. Redden Bonnie L. Sliger Joe W. Sanchez, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., Product Liability Advisory Council, Incorporated Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, Amicus on Behalf of State of Minnesota Public Citizen, Public Citizen, Incorporated Minnesota Trial Lawyers Association, Amicus on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Gilbert v. City of Little RockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Huff ex rel. Proposed Minnesota Rule 23 class v. Pinstripes, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013