Legal Opinion
State v. Rogelstad
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 15, 2002No. AC 21493PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The defendant, Shannon Rogelstad, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after *19a jury trial, of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 53-21 (l)1 and assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61.2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) restricted her right to confront and to cross-examine witnesses, (2) denied her the right to present a defense, (3) allowed the prosecutor to engage in prosecutorial misconduct and (4) refused to consider her motion for a new trial. We…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. WhipperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. WarholicSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. McCarthyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. CrockerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.