Grills v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum of Opinion and Order
PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN, District Judge.
Introduction
This matter is before the Court upon defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 14). This case alleges failure to pay overtime compensation. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED.
Facts
Plaintiff Timothy Grills filed his Complaint against defendant Hewlett-Packard Company alleging a violation of the Fair *823Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Plaintiff alleges that defendant failed to pay him overtime compensation at the rate of one and one-half times his regular rate of pay for all of the hours he worked over 40…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Leo LaPOINTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED AUTOWORKERS LOCAL 600, and Doug Thompson, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edelmann v. Keuka CollegeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Johnson v. Helion Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Loren Bennink v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026