Legal Opinion
Loren Bennink v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 4, 2026No. 1:23-cv-00774Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION LOREN BENNINK, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:23-cv-774 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, LLC, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Loren Bennink worked for Defendant Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC (Cincinnati Bell) as an operations/IT solutions and services engineer. Throughout his employment, he often worked well over forty hours per week. But according to Bennink, Cincinnati Bell did not pay him for that overtime work. So he sued Cincinnati Bell for withholding of overtime compensation under…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.