Oppenheimer v. Radke & Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Jas. M. Trout-t, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against defendants as the makers of two promissory notes aggregating the principal sum of $2,206.87, for which amount and interest thereon judgment was rendered for plaintiff as the indorsee of said notes.
The two notes are in terms payable to Ciner and Seeleman who, before maturity thereof, indorsed them to the State Bank of New York, which passed the amount of the two notes, less the discount therefor, to the credit of Ciner and Seeleman. This transfer to the bank 'occurred in the spring of 1910, and the bank took the notes without notice of a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thompson v. Sioux Falls National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Fox v. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Manufacturers' National Bank of Racine v. NewellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- Old National Bank v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Ashley & Rumelin v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Howells State Bank v. HekrdleNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
- Pacific Acceptance Corp. v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Southern Trust Co. v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.