Legal Opinion

Southern Trust Co. v. Vaughn

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 19, 1921No. 5605PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error 'to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma; R. E. Williams, Judge. Action hy the Southern Trust Company against the Yellow Rose •Mining Company, T. H. Vaughn, and others on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff against the corporate defendant only, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff in error brought suit in the court below against the Yellow Rose Mining Company and the de*147fendanls in error, directors of the company, upon a promissory note dated May 1, 1917, executed by said company and defendants in error, for the sum of $15,000, payable on. or before six months after date to the order of one J. I,. McCarty. The plaintiff claims to be the holder of the note in due course.

The defendants in error and the company as a defense set up in their answer with some particularity that in February, 1917, J. I,. McCarty, by fraudulent,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rice v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. Dresser v. Missouri & Iowa Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Thompson v. Sioux Falls National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Evans v. KisterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  5. National Bank of Commerce v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ashley & Rumelin v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Saint Paul Insurance Companies v. First National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1966
  3. First Nat. Bank v. Cross NapperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Valley National Bank v. MooremanArizona Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API