Pacific Acceptance Corp. v. Goodman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against him for the amount due on a check of three thousand dollars made by him and delivered to plaintiff’s assignor. We have not been favored with any brief or argument on behalf of respondent.
Apparently it is a fact, and we shall so assume, that as against the Pacific Motors Corporation, named as payee in the check, the defendant at all times has had a good defense. The trial court, however, determined that the plaintiff is a holder of said check in due course and for value. If the record supports that decision, the judgment must be affirmed.
Th…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Merchs. Nat'l Bank of Santa Monica v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Oppenheimer v. Radke & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bank of Italy v. Welbilt Auto Body Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Peaples Finance & Thift Co. v. Matthews Fruit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Robb v. CardozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bramante v. KrugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Howland v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.