Legal Opinion

Pacific Acceptance Corp. v. Goodman

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1925No. Docket No. 4371PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against him for the amount due on a check of three thousand dollars made by him and delivered to plaintiff’s assignor. We have not been favored with any brief or argument on behalf of respondent.

Apparently it is a fact, and we shall so assume, that as against the Pacific Motors Corporation, named as payee in the check, the defendant at all times has had a good defense. The trial court, however, determined that the plaintiff is a holder of said check in due course and for value. If the record supports that decision, the judgment must be affirmed.

Th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merchs. Nat'l Bank of Santa Monica v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Oppenheimer v. Radke & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy v. Welbilt Auto Body Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Peaples Finance & Thift Co. v. Matthews Fruit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Robb v. CardozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Bramante v. KrugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Howland v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API