Legal Opinion

State v. Bowden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1968No. 679PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The challenge to the bill of indictment is not sustained. An indictment is sufficient if it charges all essential elements of the offense with sufficient particularity to apprise the defendant of the specific accusations against him and (1) will enable him to prepare his defense and (2) will protect him against another prosecution for that same offense. The indictment in this case sufficiently charges all essential elements of rape. G.S. 15-153; State v. Courtney, 248 N.C. 447, 103 S.E. 2d 861; State v. Gibbs, 234 N.C. 259, 66 S.E. 2d 883; State v. Morgan, 226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E. 2d 166; State…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. CourtneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. State v. . BallangeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. FearingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. WetmoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API