Legal Opinion

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Fort Smith v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 17, 1949No. 4-8885PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert A. Leflar, J.

While plaintiff (appellee), Mrs. Alta Hicks, was transferring several bottles of Coca-Cola, bottled by defendant, from the original case to an ice box in plaintiff’s restaurant at Booneville, the upper part of her foot was severely cut by flying glass from one of the bottles. The evidence differed as to whether the bottle exploded while it was in plaintiff’s hand, or was dropped by her on the floor and broke there, or was knocked out of. her hand by contact with some other nearby article. Plaintiff’s suit against defendant bottler was brought on the theory that the bottle exploded in her hand…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Honea, by Next Friend v. Coca Cola Bot. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Graham v. BadgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  5. Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bornstein v. Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Evangelio v. Metropolitan Bottling Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Barker v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Hopson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1956
  5. United States Ex Rel. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. H. R. Henderson & Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API