Legal Opinion

Bornstein v. Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 3, 1958PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hehek, J.

The Appellate Division of the Superior Court affirmed a judgment for plaintiffs entered on a jury verdict in the Law Division of the court in an action in tort against the defendant Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc. for neg*266ligen.ee in “bottling and dispensing” beverages, one “under the trade name of Tepsi-Cola,’ ” whereby “one of the bottles under the control of the defendant exploded” and destroyed the infant plaintiff’s right eye. The case is here by our certification on defendant’s motion.

Error is assigned on the holding of the Appellate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Graham v. BadgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Bradley v. Conway Springs Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Boykin v. Chase Bottling WorksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Buckelew v. GrossbardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Hubbard Ex Rel. Hubbard v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Myrlak v. Port Auth. of NY and NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. Elizabeth Fedorczyk v. Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. Royal Caribbean Anders Wilhelmsen and Company Kjell KarlsenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  5. Caravaggio v. D'AGOSTINISupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API