Legal Opinion

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 1993No. 2224 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Georgia-Pacific Corporation (G-P) appeals from orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR) affirming a referee’s decision to grant benefits to former G-P employees (Claimants) pursuant to sections 401 and 4(u) of The Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Law (Law) 1 effective benefit week ending July 14, 1990. We affirm.

In the Spring of 1990, G-P decided to close its facility in Reading, Pennsylvania, thereby terminating all employee positions in that plant. G-P’s action was a “plant closing” as that term is defined in the Worker Adjustment and Retraining…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. United States v. IbarraSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Masland v. BachmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Grapevine Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ensle v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. CallahanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Pennsylvania v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Laster v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API