Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Jorgensen v. Pressnall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1976PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C. J.

This is a suit for the recission of a mobile home purchase contract and for the recovery of plaintiffs’ down payment and damages. Defendants are Pre-ssnall, the seller of the mobile home, and Commercial Credit Company, the company financing the transaction. Commercial Credit counterclaims for losses incurred in repossession of the mobile home and, in the event recission is granted, seeks recovery of damages from Pressnall for breach of a warranty. The trial court found for plaintiffs against Pressnall and for Commercial Credit on its cross-complaint against Pre-ssnall. Pressnall appeals.

Plaint…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Overland Bond & Investment Corp. v. HowardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  2. Herbstman v. Eastman Kodak CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Lanners v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Minsel v. El Rancho Mobile Home Center, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Frontier Mobile Homes Sales, Inc. v. TriglethSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Frank's Maintenance & Engineering, Inc. v. C. A. Rorerts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Jensen v. Seigel Mobile Homes GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Ibrahim v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API