Legal Opinion

Swenson v. Mills

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 2005No. 00 CV 0456 ST; A120139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, P. J.

Defendant E. R. “Max” Mills, the assignee of a lease and option to purchase the subject property, appeals a judgment for plaintiff on plaintiffs claims (1) for a declaratory ruling that defendant is in default of the lease and (2) seeking possession of the leased property and damages for waste. Defendant contends on appeal that the trial court erred in entering judgment for plaintiff and in dismissing his counterclaim, asserting that, by virtue of a quitclaim deed to the property from the original lessee, his interest is that of an equitable mortgagor and can be terminated only by foreclosure…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blue River Sawmills, Ltd. v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Fry v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Umpqua Forest Industries v. Neenah-Oregon Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bailey v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Long v. StormsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. v. Makarios-Oregon, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
  2. Casebeer v. Krocker (In re Estate of Casebeer)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Logan v. TiegsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API