Legal Opinion

Giarratano v. Murray

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1988No. Nos. 87-7518, 87-7519PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge:

This is a consolidated appeal and cross-appeal arising from a class action initiated by death row inmates in the State of Virginia pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The State appeals an order of the district court requiring the appointment of counsel for inmates challenging their death penalty through state habeas proceedings. The inmate class cross-appeals the district court’s refusal to order the appointment of counsel in federal post-conviction proceedings. By a majority vote, a panel of this Court reversed that portion of the judgment of the district court, 668…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Murray v. GiarratanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  3. Peterkin v. JeffesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Peterkin v. JeffesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. Joe Louis Wise, Sr. v. David Williams Attorney General of the Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API