Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Hannigan
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided June 9, 2000No. 83,428PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogg, J.:
The State appeals the district court’s ruling that George Thomas was entitled to a credit on his aggregate sentence based on the provisions of K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 21-4608(3)(e). Thomas appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for clarification regarding appropriate application of the credit.
Thomas has been continuously under the supervision of the Department of Corrections (DOC) since his initial sentence in 1980. He was sentenced on three separate occasions. The second and third sentences were for crimes committed while on parole.
On October 24, 1980, Thomas received a 3- to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. DonlaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Chiles v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Stansbury v. HanniganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- United States v. Fred M. GloverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. BruceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. MaxonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
- Woodberry v. HanniganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Thomas v. HanniganCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.