Legal Opinion

Stansbury v. Hannigan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 5, 1998No. 79,384PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

This appeal by the Department of Corrections and cross-appeal by the petitioner inmate involve two questions. The first question is whether the withholding of good time credits from the petitioner under regulations amended after the petitioner’s crime was committed violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. The second question is whether internal management policies adopted after die petitioner’s sentence, resulting in his loss of privileges, violates the petitioner’s due process rights under the United States…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Williams v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. PrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Searcy v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. State v. ToddSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. BernhardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  5. Timothy Hatten v. Joe White, Employee, Usp Leavenworth Justin C. Harsha, Employee, Usp Leavenworth A. Fekekte, Employee, Usp LeavenworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API