Legal Opinion
Chiles v. State
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided March 4, 1994No. 70,018PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
ABBOTT, J.:
Anthony D. Chiles filed a petition for writ of mandamus and quo warranto, naming the State of Kansas the respondent in this action. The appellate defender was appointed to represent Chiles. The case involves the limited retroactivity provision (K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4724[b][l]) of the new Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act. Chiles does not fall within the limited retroactivity provision of the new law and, therefore, seeks an order from this court requiring the State to apply the retroactivity provision to him. If the provision is applied to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mathews v. De CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. LimonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- State v. GaudinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Ryco Packaging Corp. v. Chapelle International, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.