Shinn v. Macpherson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Cary, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, J.:
The plaintiff and the defendant, John Maepherson, formed a copartnership June 2d, 1879, which continued to September 24th, 1880, when it was dissolved by mutual consent. During this time John Maepherson was the owner of a certain house and lot, where he resided with his wife, the defendant Esther Sutherland Maepherson, and on which he had previously, to wit, May 19th, 1877, executed to one Borel a mortgage to secure the payment to him of the sum of one thousand seven hundred dollars in gold coin. A few days previous to the dissolution of the partnership between Shinn and Maepherson,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barber v. BabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by16 opinions
- Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kemp v. EnemarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Smith v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Robertson v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Demetris v. DemetrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.