Commonwealth v. Klick
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge:
This appeal arises from appellant’s conviction of robbery 1 following a jury trial conducted on October 12, 1977. 2 Finding no merit in the two arguments advanced by appellant in support of this appeal, we affirm the judgment of sentence.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict winner, the factual basis of the case is as follows. At approximately 2:56 p. m. on May 31, 1977, Jacob Wasserstrom, the manager of the Sheridan Manor Apartment Houses in Wilkes-Barre, was in the supply room of the complex when he heard someone enter the adjacent office.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. YountSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. HickmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. PiloskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. KramerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GoldblumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- State v. AcquistoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- Commonwealth v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. HattenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. ConnorsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.