Commonwealth v. Hatten
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
The sole issue on appeal is whether double jeopardy bars appellant’s retrial on charges of simple assault and defiant trespass after a mistrial was declared sua sponte at her first trial. We find that retrial is barred and, therefore, reverse the order below and discharge appellant.
On August 5, 1980, a non-jury trial of appellant and her co-defendant, Stan Fields, began in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia. During cross-examination of the complaining witness, the assistant district attorney requested that the witness’s address not be disclosed. (N.T. August 5, 1980 at 14-15).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. GoldblumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Walton v. AytchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BalogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Neal v. Altoona Hospital, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County1985
- Com. v. Lee, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.