Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hatten

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 2, 1985No. 01117PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

The sole issue on appeal is whether double jeopardy bars appellant’s retrial on charges of simple assault and defiant trespass after a mistrial was declared sua sponte at her first trial. We find that retrial is barred and, therefore, reverse the order below and discharge appellant.

On August 5, 1980, a non-jury trial of appellant and her co-defendant, Stan Fields, began in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia. During cross-examination of the complaining witness, the assistant district attorney requested that the witness’s address not be disclosed. (N.T. August 5, 1980 at 14-15).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. GoldblumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Walton v. AytchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BalogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Neal v. Altoona Hospital, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County1985
  5. Com. v. Lee, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API