Legal Opinion

Williams v. Dollison

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1980No. 79-1144PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

The major issue involved herein is whether appellee is entitled to a post-suspension hearing before the registrar, in addition to his right to appeal the registrar's suspension in the Court of Common Pleas. Appellee claims no right to any pre-suspension hearing by the registrar, and such claim is not before this court.

The United States Supreme Court has held that a driver’s license is a substantial right of which a citizen may not be deprived without due process of law. Bell v. Burson (1971), 402 U.S. 535; Dixon v. Love (1977), 431 U.S. 105.

Appellee contends that R. C. 119.06 and 119.07…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. HochhauslerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Doyle v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. CowanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Granzow v. Bureau of SupportOhio Supreme Court · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API