Williams v. Dollison
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The major issue involved herein is whether appellee is entitled to a post-suspension hearing before the registrar, in addition to his right to appeal the registrar's suspension in the Court of Common Pleas. Appellee claims no right to any pre-suspension hearing by the registrar, and such claim is not before this court.
The United States Supreme Court has held that a driver’s license is a substantial right of which a citizen may not be deprived without due process of law. Bell v. Burson (1971), 402 U.S. 535; Dixon v. Love (1977), 431 U.S. 105.
Appellee contends that R. C. 119.06 and 119.07…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. HochhauslerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Doyle v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CowanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Granzow v. Bureau of SupportOhio Supreme Court · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.