Legal Opinion
State v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1996No. 95-880PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
This case presents the court with the question of whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel precludes relitigating, in the criminal proceeding for a charge of drunk driving, an issue that was previously ruled on at the administrative-license-suspension hearing.
This is one of three cases we decide today that require us to determine the constitutionality and application of R.C. 4511.191. For a discussion of the purpose of the 1993 amendments to R.C. 4511.191, see State v. Gustafson. Under the new law, an arresting officer, acting on behalf of the Registrar of Motor Vehicles (“BMV”), is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. GustafsonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Polikoff v. AdamOhio Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. Chapman (In Re Chapman)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Cook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Travis Abbott v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Nye v. Ohio Board of Examiners of ArchitectsOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.