Legal Opinion
State v. Hochhausler
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1996No. 95-1365PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
In this case, we are asked to determine several issues relating to the constitutionality of R.C. 4511.191 and 4511.195.
*458It is a well-settled rule that an Act of the General Assembly is entitled to a strong presumption of constitutionality. Arnold v. Cleveland (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 35, 616 N.E.2d 163. Moreover, challenged legislation will not be invalidated unless the challenger establishes the unconstitutional nature of the statute beyond a reasonable doubt. Hilton v. Toledo (1980), 62 Ohio St.2d 394, 396, 16 O.O.3d 430, 431, 405 N.E.2d 1047, 1049. We apply these principles to both appeals.
I
R.C…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Thomas v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Grimes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Midwest Media Property, L.L.C v. Symmes TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.