Granzow v. Bureau of Support
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
In his proposition of law, plaintiff asserts that his constitutional rights to due process and equal protection have been violated because he is required to make alimony payments through the bureau of support, now the support enforcement agency, and because he also is required to remit a two percent fee on those payments. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the court of appeals’ judgment that these requirements are constitutional.
The two percent charge was imposed on plaintiff pursuant to R.C. 2301.35, 2301.36, and Loc. R. 4.01 of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Division of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Menefee v. Queen City MetroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Roseman v. Firemen & Policemen's Death Benefit FundOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Ohio University Board of Trustees v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Drees Co. v. Hamilton TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Building Industry Ass'n of Cleveland & Suburban Counties v. City of WestlakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State ex rel. Bender v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.