Legal Opinion

Stowe v. Bologna

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 29, 1992No. 90-P-578PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

On December 19, 1991, we issued an unpublished memorandum in this appeal affirming the grant, by a judge of the Superior Court, of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. See 31 Mass. App. Ct. 1119. In awarding summary judgment for Krenie and Marie Stowe on their claim of rent overcharges, the motion judge had relied upon a deci sion of the Cambridge rent control board (board), from which no appeal had been taken. We agreed with the judge that the board’s decision was entitled to preclusive effect.

On January 21, 1992, the defendants, Vincent Bologna and the 310 Corporation (the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Forsyth School for Dental Hygienists v. Board of Registration in DentistryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Almeida v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Duvin v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. Flynn v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stowe v. BolognaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. Stowe v. BolognaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Conservation Commission v. PachecoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  4. Diaz v. City of SomervilleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  5. Olmstead v. Department of Telecommunications & CableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API