Legal Opinion

Arber v. Equitable Beneficial Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-6458PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOYNER, District Judge.

Defendant Equitable Beneficial Life Insurance Company has, for the fourth time, moved this Court to dismiss a complaint filed by Plaintiffs David and Carol Arber and their employer, Omni Finishing Systems, Inc. This, the Third Amended Complaint, alleges violations of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001-1461 (1985 & Supp.1994) (ERISA) and common law. Earlier in this litigation, Equitable filed a motion to dismiss the original complaint, which was dismissed in part with leave to amend. The Plaintiffs did amend their…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
Ransom v. MarrazzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Valley Forge Convention & Visitors Bureau v. Visitor's Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998