Legal Opinion
Schweiso v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 12, 1984No. Civ. 53401PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINBERG, J.
On this appeal 1 from dismissals in these consolidated actions following summary judgments in favor of the same defendants (Williams, Palo Alto Town & Country Village et al.) the only issue is whether a lessor may arbitrarily refuse consent when a commercial lease provides that a lessee shall not assign or sublease the premises without the written consent of the lessor.
The pleadings, affidavits and counteraffidavits alleged the following: Appellants Stevenson, Schweiso, and Jazbutis each had leased commercial premises from the respondents. Paragraph 13 of each lease…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Fernandez v. VazquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Mecham v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Arrington v. Walter E. Heller International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Dwayne Prestin v. Mobil Oil Corporation, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Fashion World, Inc. v. Finard (In Re Fashion World, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984
- Kreisher v. Mobil Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.