Legal Opinion · Dissent

Derosia v. Warden, N.H. State Prison

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 9, 2003No. 2002-553Published

1DissentDalianis, J.

I disagree with the majority’s interpretation of RSA 637:11,11(b) (1996), and would hold that the crime of burglary cannot serve as a predicate conviction for purposes of that statute. RSA 637:11, 11(b) provides, in part, that a theft constitutes a class B felony if “[t]he actor has been twice before convicted of theft of property or services, as a felony or class A misdemeanor.” While not deciding whether burglary in its “generic sense” constitutes a predicate offense for penalty enhancement, the majority holds that the crime of burglary with the purpose to commit theft is the equivalent of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HattSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  2. State v. HillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. State v. MeloonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. State v. AllardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API