Legal Opinion

State v. Allard

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 18, 2002No. 2001-492PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

Following a bench trial in the Concord District Court (Robbins, J.), the defendant, Yvonne Allard, was convicted of giving a false report to law enforcement, RSA 641:4,1 (1996). On appeal, she raises five issues. First, she argues the evidence was insufficient to prove that her purpose in making the false statement was to induce a law enforcement officer to believe that another person had committed a crime. Second, she argues that to be convicted under RSA 641:4, the defendant must initiate the contact that leads to the false statement. Third, she argues that her conviction amounts to an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SmallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. Derosia v. Warden, N.H. State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API