Legal Opinion
State v. Hill
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 2, 2001No. 98-461PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant, Paul Hill, appeals his convictions in Portsmouth District Court (Warhall, J.) for driving while intoxicated, second offense, RSA 265:82-b (1993 & Supp. 2000); driving after revocation, RSA 263:64 (1993); disobeying a police officer, RSA 265:4 (1993); and false report to law enforcement, RSA 641:4 (1996). On appeal, the defendant asserts that: (1) evidence of his identity and motor vehicle record should have been excluded as fruits of an illegally obtained statement; (2) the false report to law enforcement charge should have been dismissed because the State failed to establish…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. BeauchesneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. RemickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. DemerittSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. RixSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.