Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1905PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from, the District Court of Caddo County; before F. E. Gillette.. Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tbe eonrt by

Beauchamp, J.:

This action was commenced by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in error as officers of the town of Bridgeport, for an injunction against the enforcement of an ordinance. In the absence of the judge of the district court, on application a temporary injunction was allowed by the probate judge. Subsequently a demurrer to the petition was sustained, and the temporary injunction dissolved, and exceptions saved. -Plaintiff in error brings the case here by petition in error and transcript.

It appears from the petition that the plaintiff in error at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallack v. Society for Reformation of Juvenile DelinquentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. M. Golden & Co. v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  3. Poyer v. Village of Des PlainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  4. Levy v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1875

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ConnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Grantham v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Portland Fish Co. v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Nation v. ChismSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Allen v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API