Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Conner

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1909PublishedCited by 40 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. T. M. M’ Connell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shields

These consolidated causes were heard together in the chancery court of Hamilton county and in this court, and will he so determined.

Complainants in the first-styled cause are J. W. Kelly & Co., Wakeman Distilling Company, and Chattanooga Brewing Company, all corporations created and organized under the laws of Tennessee, having their domiciles and places of business in Chattanooga, Hamilton county, Tenn., where they owned and operated distilleries and a brewery, and were, previous to July 1, 1909, without question, lawfully engaged in the wholesaling of whiskies and beer.

*345The defendants are S.…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Dishmon v. Shelby State Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. First American Trust Co. v. Franklin-Murray Development Co., L.P.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Nolen v. RiechmanDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1915
  5. Erwin Billard Parlor v. BucknerTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API