Legal Opinion

McGuiness v. Department of Correction

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

This case concerns the effect of a tie vote on the Civil Service Commission (commission) in an appeal from a *661decision of the Department of Correction (department) to terminate two employees. On this record, we conclude that the effect of the tie vote was that the initial decision of the hearing officer affirming the department’s termination order became the final decision of the commission, which, in turn, is subject to judicial review.

1. Background. The plaintiffs, Benjamin McGuiness and Richard Mullen, were employees of the department, assigned to the Massachusetts Alcohol and Substance…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Amherst-Pelham Regional School Committee v. Department of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Finkelstein v. Board of Registration in OptometryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. City of Cambridge v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Padmanabhan v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API