Legal Opinion
Magel v. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 28, 1991No. 91-2710PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KATZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought action under Section 5 of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act ("Act"), 43 P.S. § 955(a). Plaintiff alleged that she was discriminated against because of her disability. Defendant removed action to this court's jurisdiction under Section 25(b) of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. § 632. Under 12 U.S.C. § 632, "any Federal Reserve bank which is a defendant in [suits of a civil nature] may, at any time before the trial thereof, remove such suit from a State court into the district court of the United States." Defendant had only submitted…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- George Dunbar Prewitt, Jr. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Thomas Jasany v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Daniel Kimbro, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Atlantic Richfield Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bonita McDonald v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare, Polk CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Michael Mele v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Wymer v. JH Properties, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Svarnas v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.