Legal Opinion

Mullen v. G.M.A.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1996No. WD 50435PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

This case marks the forty-first appeal presented in this court by the plaintiff, Dr. Leo Mullen. Mullen’s petition was dismissed. His initial brief was stricken. The second brief is not helpful. As best deciphered, the cause presented by Mullen is as follows: Mullen purchased a Pontiac automobile in Phoenix, Arizona and financed the purchase through the defendant GMAC. Mullen, in his petition, claimed the terms in the original contract with the dealer were incorrect, and renegotiated and signed a new contract with the dealer before GMAC bought the note. The petition contains…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heberer v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. PaineWebber, Inc. v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Schauer v. Gundaker Movits Real Estate Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Dale v. HardyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. White v. Mid-Continent Investments, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Arnold v. ErkmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Bohac v. WalshMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Rhodes Engineering Co. v. Public Water Supply District No. 1Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Capital One Bank v. HardinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Williams v. Belgrade State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API