Legal Opinion

Klever v. Canton Sachsenheim, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1999No. Nos. 98-1906 and 98-1966PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

In Smith v. The 10th Inning, Inc. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 289, 551 N.E.2d 1296, we reviewed the proposition that a liquor-serving establishment could be held responsible to a patron who self-inflicts injury or death due to being intoxicated. We held that an intoxicated patron could not maintain a cause of action against the liquor permit holder for injuries resulting from his intoxication. Today we are asked to decide whether the Smith bar to recovery applies where the intoxicated patron has not attained the legal drinking age (twenty-one) but has attained the age of majority (eighteen). We…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Randall v. Village of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Gressman v. McClainOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Winters v. Silver Fox BarHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Smith v. 10th Inning, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. LaGuire v. KainMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thomasson v. Thomasson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Lesnau v. Andate Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Krichner v. Shooters on the Water, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Johnson v. MontgomeryOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Johnson v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API