Legal Opinion

Lesnau v. Andate Enterprises, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 2001No. 00-1422PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

We are asked to construe the standard of liability required under R.C. 4399.18(A)(3), Ohio’s Dram Shop Act. The statute codifies the longstanding rule limiting the liability of a liquor permit holder for injuries caused by an intoxicated person except under certain limited circumstances. The central dispute before this court is whether the statute requires that the liquor permit holder have actual knowledge of the underage status of the purchaser before liability may be imposed for injuries to a third person.

*468Factual Background

Appellee Donald W. Lesnau, Administrator of the Estate of Janice…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Mason v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wesley v. WalravenOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Krichner v. Shooters on the Water, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Pearn v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. KuckOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Bookfriends, Inc. v. TaftDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API