Legal Opinion
Royalton Taxpayers' Protective Assoc., Inc. v. Wassmansdorf
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 2, 1969No. 130-69PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This is a petition- for mandamus by the above named petitioners to order the Selectmen of the Town of Royalton to warn a special town meeting requested in certain petitions filed with the Selectmen of said town by the petitioners, claiming to be approximately twelve per cent of the voters of said town. Petitioners appeared before this Court without counsel. Only Phyllis Mudgett appeared, pro se, as her own representative in argument before the Court.
The petition does not contain the recognizance required by 12 V.S.A. Sec. 657.
On motion, the writ could have been abated, but in the absence of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Petition of Town of EssexSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Buttolph v. OsbornSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
- Town of Glover v. AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- Matter of Mae Disorda SavageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Potter v. Town of ClarendonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Proceedings Concerning a Neglected ChildSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
- Town of Brattleboro v. GarfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Bargman v. BrewerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Robert A. Skiff, Jr. v. South Burlington School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Kirchner v. GiebinkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.