Legal Opinion
Kirchner v. Giebink
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 13, 1988No. 85-431PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Plaintiffs, residents of Stowe, appeal from a superior court order dismissing their action to nullify an agreement between the Town and a developer with respect to expansion of the town sewage facility. We affirm in part and remand in part for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Following discussion at a regularly scheduled meeting, in May, 1985, the town selectmen entered an agreement with Stowe Club Associates (SCA), under which SCA’s proposed hotel and condominium project could dispose of 40,000 gallons per day of its sewage at the municipal treatment plant if SCA agreed to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Teter v. Clark CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- My Sister's Place v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- San Marcos Water District v. San Marcos Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Illinois Power Co. v. City of JacksonvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- State Ex Rel. City of Fostoria v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robes v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Mooney v. Town of StoweSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Hansen v. Town of CharlestonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Robert A. Skiff, Jr. v. South Burlington School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Handy v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.