Town of Brattleboro v. Garfield
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.
¶ 1. This consolidated appeal arose out of a dispute regarding the proper way to fill a single vacancy on the Town of Brattleboro selectboard. Appellants are various Brattleboro citizens who argue that the law provides for a special election. Appellee, Town of Brattleboro, argues that the remaining board members must fill the vacancy by appointment. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Windham Superior Court concluded that the law requires appointment. Also on appeal is the trial court’s dismissal of appellant Steven K-Brooks’s open meeting law claim. We affirm.
¶2. The facts are not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Amiot v. AmesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Trombley v. Bellows Falls Union High School District No. 27Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- E. B. & A. C. Whiting Co. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Our Lady of Ephesus House of Prayer, Inc. v. Town of JamaicaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Holton v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Burlington v. Fairpoint Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Smith v. DesautelsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Price v. Town of FairleeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Rutland Herald v. Vermont State Police and Office of the Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- State v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.