Legal Opinion

Town of Brattleboro v. Garfield

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 16, 2006No. Nos. 05-274 & 05-314PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. This consolidated appeal arose out of a dispute regarding the proper way to fill a single vacancy on the Town of Brattleboro selectboard. Appellants are various Brattleboro citizens who argue that the law provides for a special election. Appellee, Town of Brattleboro, argues that the remaining board members must fill the vacancy by appointment. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Windham Superior Court concluded that the law requires appointment. Also on appeal is the trial court’s dismissal of appellant Steven K-Brooks’s open meeting law claim. We affirm.

¶2. The facts are not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Amiot v. AmesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Trombley v. Bellows Falls Union High School District No. 27Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. E. B. & A. C. Whiting Co. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  4. Our Lady of Ephesus House of Prayer, Inc. v. Town of JamaicaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. Holton v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Burlington v. Fairpoint Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  2. Smith v. DesautelsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. Price v. Town of FairleeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. Rutland Herald v. Vermont State Police and Office of the Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. State v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API