Legal Opinion

Van Sickle v. Doolittle

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 25, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Sioux District Court. — William Hutchinson, Judge. Action for damages consequent on alleged malpractice resulted in judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1. Evidence: standard for judging alleged malpractice. Marjorie Van Sickle died September 20, 1911, at age of nine years and some months. The defendant attended her as a physician during her last sickness. The petition alleged, that he failed to exercise ordinary care and skill in effecting a cure tor the ailment with which the child was afflicted, in that (1) he neglected to visit her with such frequency as her condition demanded, and did , *887not respond with promptness when called, (2) failed to exercise ordinary care and skill in treating the patient for such ailment, and (3) omitted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tomer v. AikenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Van Sickle v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Floyd v. MichieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Hardy v. . DahlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Furgason v. BellaireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Stitzer Hotel Co. v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
  5. Lemon v. KesselSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API