Legal Opinion

Tomer v. Aiken

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Dallas District Court.— IioN. J. H. Apple-gate, Judge. ActioN for damages alleged to have resulted from tbe negligent treatment of tbe dislocation of. tbe clavicle. Tbe verdict was for tbe plaintiff, and from judgment thereon defendants appeal.—

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, J.—

i Negligence-diagnosis. Only two errors are argued, but these involve tbe twelve points raised in appellants’ belief. Tbe one challenges tbe propriety'of a hypothetical question, and the °^er the sufficiency of the evidence to support |jje verdict On the 26th day of June, 1902, the plaintiff undertook to repair the tin roof on his house. When descending from the porch, he placed one foot on a stepladder about five feet high, which slipped, and he fell to the ground. The outer end of the collar bone, or clavicle, was dislocated from the shoulder blade, or scapula, •or, technically…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ramberg v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Jenkins v. Charleston General Hospital & Training SchoolWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Osborn ex rel. Osborn v. CareyIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hill v. BoughtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Edwards v. UlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API