Legal Opinion

Randles v. Nickum & Kelly Sand & Gravel Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1942PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The plaintiffs recovered a judgment based on the verdict of a jury in an action for damages, both general and special, arising out of the conversion of a stock of lumber. The defendant has appealed, and assigns as error rulings of the trial court admitting evidence respecting loss of anticipated profits and submitting to the jury the question of the right of the plaintiffs to recover damages on account thereof.

The plaintiffs were engaged in the business of manufacturing finished lumber at Vancouver, Washington, and of building houses in Portland, Oregon. About May 1,1939, they rented space in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blagen v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McGinnis v. StudebakerOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Stubblefield v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hoskins v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Preble v. HannaOregon Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lautenbach v. MeredithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. Douglas Construction Corp. v. Mazama Timber Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. ShawcrossNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Smith v. ABELOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Verret v. LeagjeldOregon Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API